Dear Gate Post users, we’re excited to announce a brand-new upgrade to our user interface! The new version is simpler, smoother, and packed with many thoughtful new features. Update now and explore what's new! What do you think of the new Gate Post experience? Which features do you like most? Have you noticed any surprises or improvements? Share your experience now to split a $50 prize pool!
🎁 We'll select 5 users with outstanding posts, each winning $10!
How to participate:
1. Follow Gate_Post;
2. Create a post with the hashtag #MyGatePostUpgradeExperience# , sharing your feedback and experie
Video Review of Twitter Space|June 1st Officially Effective, Interpretation of Hong Kong’s New Regulations on Virtual Assets
From June 1st, Hong Kong will implement virtual asset regulatory regulations. How can exchanges, institutions and related companies participate under the new regulations? What are the implications for ordinary investors? PANews invites guests from Okey Cloud Chain, Beosin, Matrixport, Invest Hong Kong and JunHe Law Firm to interpret together!
The following is the timeline directory of this video, friends who need it can jump directly:
Live Review丨June 1st Officially Effective, Interpretation of Hong Kong’s New Regulations on Virtual Assets
Video timeline and content:
00:00-08:32 Self-introduction of guests
08:32-19:28 What issues did the guest’s institution put forward their opinions on? Did the responses meet expectations?
19:28 -37:33 Compared with the regulations in Singapore, the United States and other countries, what are the similarities and differences in the overall regulatory framework and implementation details in Hong Kong?
37:33- 50:20 In the future, do a large number of traditional financial investors in Hong Kong, and even mainland investors, agree?
50:20 -61:30 Can the current financial technology meet the regulation of virtual assets?
61:30 – 78:14 According to the current development trend of the encryption market, in what aspects will the Guidelines be updated or modified in the future?
78:14 – 93:41 Q&A