Judge Challenges Double Sentencing Standard The prosecution responds that the severity of the crime is key

Recently, at a court hearing, the judge questioned the prosecution on the issue of sentencing. The judge noted that the prosecution recommended a double sentencing standard and expressed concern that it could lead to inconsistent sentencing outcomes. In response, the representative of the prosecution stressed that no defendant was overly responsible. The prosecution further explained that they believe that there should be no difference in the sentencing itself, and that the real difference lies in the seriousness of the crime. This confrontation reflects the ongoing debate in the judicial community on sentencing standards and fairness.

View Original
The content is for reference only, not a solicitation or offer. No investment, tax, or legal advice provided. See Disclaimer for more risks disclosure.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainHolmesvip
· 06-27 14:01
What kind of punishment? A whole bunch got shot down.
Reply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 06-25 16:10
This judge is really hard to be.
Reply0
SnapshotStrikervip
· 06-24 15:14
How can we talk about fairness when sentencing is not uniform?
Reply0
TerraNeverForgetvip
· 06-24 15:11
The amount and the sentence are not determined by us.
Reply0
governance_ghostvip
· 06-24 15:07
Heavy penalties are necessary to maintain stability!
Reply0
MidsommarWalletvip
· 06-24 15:05
Can it be judged accurately this time...
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)