Recently, at a court hearing, the judge questioned the prosecution on the issue of sentencing. The judge noted that the prosecution recommended a double sentencing standard and expressed concern that it could lead to inconsistent sentencing outcomes. In response, the representative of the prosecution stressed that no defendant was overly responsible. The prosecution further explained that they believe that there should be no difference in the sentencing itself, and that the real difference lies in the seriousness of the crime. This confrontation reflects the ongoing debate in the judicial community on sentencing standards and fairness.
View Original
The content is for reference only, not a solicitation or offer. No investment, tax, or legal advice provided. See Disclaimer for more risks disclosure.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainHolmes
· 06-27 14:01
What kind of punishment? A whole bunch got shot down.
Reply0
GasFeeCrier
· 06-25 16:10
This judge is really hard to be.
Reply0
SnapshotStriker
· 06-24 15:14
How can we talk about fairness when sentencing is not uniform?
Reply0
TerraNeverForget
· 06-24 15:11
The amount and the sentence are not determined by us.
Reply0
governance_ghost
· 06-24 15:07
Heavy penalties are necessary to maintain stability!
Judge Challenges Double Sentencing Standard The prosecution responds that the severity of the crime is key
Recently, at a court hearing, the judge questioned the prosecution on the issue of sentencing. The judge noted that the prosecution recommended a double sentencing standard and expressed concern that it could lead to inconsistent sentencing outcomes. In response, the representative of the prosecution stressed that no defendant was overly responsible. The prosecution further explained that they believe that there should be no difference in the sentencing itself, and that the real difference lies in the seriousness of the crime. This confrontation reflects the ongoing debate in the judicial community on sentencing standards and fairness.