#PI##PI# After the founder of #PI# PI participated in the encryption conference consensus2025, I have some personal views:
First, there is a question: why was PI founder Nikolaus placed in the AI group?
In my opinion, Nicolas clarified what PI is at this meeting. For me, PI is not just about mobile mining. He is addressing the issue of Bitcoin's inability to integrate into the real economy. It is now clear that no matter how much economic freedom Bitcoin has, it cannot surpass government authority.
In simple terms, PI is building an infrastructure for a government administrative department for the entire cryptocurrency ecosystem, serving as authentication for the whole cryptocurrency sphere. The actual decentralization removes manual management and shifts to centralized artificial intelligence management, making the anarchy of the cryptocurrency realm truly manageable, with the manager being artificial intelligence. This way, complete transparency, openness, and compliance verifiability can be achieved, rather than just considering the transparency of individual areas of concern.
Your secret cash can be transparent to your wife, but is it equally transparent to your lover outside? It's not that you think transparent paper is money, but rather everything.
As mentioned above, the currently known "key point" is that the project that PI surpasses is WLD. What Ultraman failed to accomplish has been completed by Nicholas, and everyone has tokens, and everyone is undergoing real KYC. WLD is suspected of identity theft, while PI is not, because PI is conducting decentralized KYC, managed by AI, thus facial verification during transfers has been mentioned.
Key points:
1. You cannot sell your identity; what you are selling is the PI that you have earned through hard work. Unlike WLD.
2. You cannot steal someone else's identity; in the cryptocurrency field, your identity always belongs to yourself, and you must independently protect the value of your identity.
I believe the consensus conference highlighted the focus on PI, which is creating a crypto store based on the fundamental infrastructure of entering the encryption space with real identity, just like Apple. If you want to participate in the encryption space, you must establish your real identity, not a virtual one. Moreover, it is unacceptable for any project to first create something and then consider ways to remedy KYC, as this will always lead to issues with false KYC. PI completely addresses this issue, and Nicolas has been emphasizing identity compliance for years.
Secondly, regarding the price aspect, how to view the price is a matter of human behavior for me. Most people hope that the price increase comes from a large amount of unused liquidity. Once activated, the price will rise sharply, which is the key to system pricing.
As for whether short-term trading can lower prices, it certainly can, as long as you have sufficient expertise in speculation. Short-term speculators can be easily deceived. However, prices are ultimately determined systemically; no matter how whales speculate, it will not affect the determination of the final price after decentralization.
So in the short term, when I see large holders trying to manipulate the price, I will announce in advance the time when large holders suppress the price.
Most people always look at everything from the price perspective. Is it okay to do this?
So, can I ask, when couples argue and throw things, how do you determine how long the argument will last? If an analyst tells you that he just needs to throw a computer worth 100,000 yuan and then he will stop arguing, would you say this analyst is XX? If the argument first assesses the value of the thrown items, would they still argue? Then how would you price a watermelon in someone else's hand?
People might say, how can an argument be used as an example.
This is because you don't believe that the major players are manipulating the emotions of retail investors and are building a range of techniques to try to get you to do meaningless analysis. In fact, traders know that what they deal with is your mindset. You're still using numbers to figure out why your wife is angry. Believe me, you are definitely not as professional as the physicist Stephen Hawking, who has studied calculations all his life and believes that the most complex thing is the human mind.
![]()
